History of the Anabaptists
During
the latter part of the Reformation in the 1500's, a movement began among young
people towards wholehearted Biblical fidelity as seen in the Book of Acts. This
meant a further separation from the Roman Catholic traditions than what those
who started the reformation were prepared to take. One practice that still
remained in the Protestant Church was infant baptism, which, according to
tradition, made newborn babies Christians. These young radicals insisted on
re-baptizing those adults who had come to a personal experience of faith.
This, as well as other attempts to become New Testament believers, caused
them to be persecuted by the Catholics as well as the Protestants.
The Swiss and German reformers actually joined forces with the Roman
Catholics to stamp out these re-baptizers, or Anabaptists as they were called.
From this movement came the Baptist and Brethren Churches today, as well as
other non-liturgical religious groups that exist around the world.
In time, a former priest named Menno Simons helped the Anabaptists get a
biblical foundation under their movement.
From this time on some Anabaptists were nicknamed "Mennonites". Early
Mennonites were persecuted for what they believed and many were martyred. They
decided that their response would be biblical even in the face of persecution.
So they refused to take up arms to defend themselves from the Reform and
Catholic coalition set against them. Some fled the area, but many were murdered
by their persecutors. (It is from this that they developed their standard of
non-resistance.) After years of persecution, many fled Europe for religious
freedom in North America. Later, some came to what is now Lewis County here in
Northern New York.
RENEWAL
As a religious movement, Mennonites have had their spiritual highs and lows.
As with any church, there is a constant need for renewal and realignment.
A 1987-88 survey conducted by the Mennonite Board of Missions estimated that
one-third of the Mennonite Church had participated in the Charismatic Renewal
over these past three decades. This included the Lewis County Mennonites, from
which came the first five couples who started Rhema Fellowship.
Like the young radicals from
early Anabaptist history, we are committed to becoming more and more like the
church in the Book of Acts, maintaining a strong Biblical foundation, standing
for what we believe, and promoting the need for constant renewal. We also
enthusiastically participate in what God is doing throughout His great Body
today. Our love for the brotherhood allows us to traverse many different
organizational lines. This is evident in the fact that our membership is
encouraged to maintain the various affiliations they have benefited from in the
Body, and that we find our basis for fellowship around our common quest for New
Testament Christianity.
ADDITIONAL DISTINCTIVES
Today most mainline churches would agree with the five points listed in the side
column, without necessarily accepting the extremes to which some Mennonites at
times took these truths to. In time, Anabaptists and early Mennonites would add
other distinctives, such as:
The Primacy of the New Testament.
The
Anabaptists and early Mennonites believed that both the Old and New Testaments
were God's infallible and Holy Word. In this, they agreed with other
Protestants. But they also held that the New Testament has superseded the Old
Testament as a religious system. All doctrine, they insisted, must have a New
Testament basis. The Sermon on the Mount received special emphasis. It was in
this view of the relation of the Testaments that they grounded their high
ethical demands. The Old Testament permitted hating your enemies, swearing
oaths, divorce, and polygamy; but God has now given a more complete revelation
of His will for men. It is therefore not right to set aside the higher ethic of
the New Testament in favor of that which God once permitted because of the
"hardness of heart" of the ancient Israelites. The leading reformers considered
this interpretation heresy, and proceeded to try to wipe out Anabaptism with
force—the same way the ancient Israelites handled their enemies.
They believed that good works were important.
Many
reformers rested on faith alone to save them. Anabaptists were trusting in God’s
Grace for their salvation too, but they had no tolerance for those who claimed
to be justified by faith while living unfaithful lives. Anabaptists pointed out
that Scripture says, "Faith without works is dead" (James 2:20).
They had a strong commitment to evangelism.
They were
bold in their witness, which was quite unique in a day when there was little
zeal for public evangelism.
They believed in having disciplined lives.
The
Anabaptist felt that disciplines of discipleship should be a part of our daily
live. They maintained regular times of private devotion in an age when most
people only prayed or listened to scripture in church.
Scripture Alone—
Anabaptists were usually more consistent than other reformers in their
insistence on having biblical authority for their beliefs and practices.
Separation of Church and State— Anabaptists correctly saw that the church
was the assembly of the redeemed, not something that was to be under the
management of the Government.
Here are a few
tenets that would have been commonly held by early Anabaptists:
Believers' Baptism —
Anabaptists were among the first to point out the lack of explicit biblical
support for infant baptism. They insisted that only those who trust in Jesus
Christ for their personal salvation should be baptized.
We
believe that all believers should follow Jesus’ example of being baptized in
water because the Father required it of everyone as a way to demonstrate our
obedience to Him. We prefer the practice of immersion so we can follow
Jesus’ own example.
Matthew 3:16 “When He had been
baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water…”
Acts 8:39
“…Now when they came up out of the water…”
We believe that babies and young children should be dedicated to the
Lord rather than be baptized or christened.
Headship
Every Christian should seriously order for the home and church. We
understand from 1 Corinthians 11, that the spiritual covering of Christ is
God, the spiritual covering of the husband is Christ, the spiritual covering
of the wife is the husband, and the spiritual covering of the children are
the parents. This is an important concept for the church to understand
today. However, the spiritual truth of the covering has often been obscured
by the rules and regulations that some churches impose on their people
concerning wearing a covering. We believe that the husband and wife should
be the ones to decide whether or not she should wear an outward sign to show
that she is submitted to his spiritual covering, not the church. At
WellSpring, we do not require it in order to be part of our church.
We believe Jesus is more interested in our embracing the spiritual
aspect of the covering, than wearing a sign.
We do expect all married women to be in subjection to their husbands
and unmarried women to be under the authority of their fathers. The context
for the teaching on the veil in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians is marriage
and should not be imposed on young unmarried girls.

|

|

|